You are here: Home » Blog » Inferior Pole Patella Fracture: A Modified Tension Band Fixation Technique

Inferior Pole Patella Fracture: A Modified Tension Band Fixation Technique

Views: 0     Author: Site Editor     Publish Time: 2026-07-10      Origin: Site

Introduction

The patella is the largest sesamoid bone in the human body and plays a critical role in knee extension by improving the mechanical advantage of the quadriceps tendon. Patellar fractures account for approximately 1% of all skeletal fractures, with inferior pole fractures representing a relatively uncommon but challenging subtype.

Unlike fractures involving the articular surface, inferior pole patella fractures occur in the extra-articular distal quarter of the patella and are frequently associated with disruption of the extensor mechanism. Because the inferior pole often consists of small and comminuted fragments, achieving stable anatomical reduction remains technically demanding.

Failure to restore patellar length and extensor mechanism continuity may result in:

  • Patella baja (low-lying patella)

  • Loss of knee extension strength

  • Anterior knee pain

  • Patellofemoral joint dysfunction

  • Post-traumatic degenerative changes

Although various fixation methods have been introduced, including partial patellectomy, basket plates, mesh plates, locking plates, vertical wiring techniques, and suture-based fixation, there is currently no universally accepted optimal treatment strategy.

This article introduces a modified tension band fixation technique combining Krackow suture, Nice knot fixation, and traditional tension band wiring for the treatment of inferior pole patella fractures.

Quick Answer: What Is the Best Fixation Method for Inferior Pole Patella Fractures?

Inferior pole patella fractures are difficult to fix because the distal fracture fragments are often small and comminuted, providing limited bone purchase. A modified tension band technique combining Krackow sutures, Nice knot fixation, and tension band wiring can improve fixation stability by converting tensile forces from the extensor mechanism into compressive forces across the fracture site, allowing early knee mobilization and reducing fixation failure risk.

Key Takeaways

  • Inferior pole patella fractures frequently involve extensor mechanism disruption and require restoration of patellar height and function.

  • Partial patellectomy is generally avoided because it may cause patella baja and alter patellofemoral biomechanics.

  • Traditional tension band wiring alone may fail because inferior pole fragments often cannot provide sufficient fixation strength.

  • The modified tension band technique combines Krackow sutures, Nice knot fixation, and tension band wiring to enhance fixation stability.

  • This technique allows early functional rehabilitation with favorable clinical outcomes.

1. Why Are Inferior Pole Patella Fractures Difficult to Treat?

Inferior pole patella fractures represent approximately 9.3%–22.4% of all patellar fractures.

The inferior pole differs anatomically from the main patellar body:

  • It has no articular cartilage coverage.

  • It represents approximately the distal one-quarter of the patella.

  • It serves as the attachment site of the patellar tendon.

  • Injury frequently disrupts the extensor mechanism.

Most inferior pole fractures are caused by:

  • Direct trauma

  • Sudden eccentric contraction of the quadriceps

  • High-energy injuries

Extensor Mechanism Disruption

The quadriceps tendon, patella, and patellar tendon form a continuous extensor mechanism.

When an inferior pole fracture occurs, the quadriceps force transmitted through the patella tendon may cause:

  • Inferior fragment displacement

  • Loss of patellar height

  • Difficulty maintaining reduction

Therefore, the primary surgical goals are:

  1. Restore patellar length.

  2. Reconstruct the extensor mechanism.

  3. Achieve stable fixation.

  4. Allow early postoperative rehabilitation.

2. Current Treatment Options for Inferior Pole Patella Fractures

Multiple surgical techniques have been described:

2.1 Partial Patellectomy

Partial patellectomy was historically used for severely comminuted inferior pole fractures.

However, this technique has several disadvantages:

  • Shortening of the patella

  • Increased risk of patella baja

  • Altered patellofemoral biomechanics

  • Increased contact pressure within the patellofemoral joint

Because of these concerns, modern treatment strategies generally favor patella-preserving fixation techniques whenever possible.

2.2 Basket Plate and Mesh Plate Fixation

Specialized implants such as:

  • Basket plates

  • Mesh plates

  • Locking plates

have been developed to improve fixation of small inferior pole fragments.

Advantages:

  • Larger contact area

  • Improved fragment capture

  • Early knee motion without external immobilization

However, limitations include:

  • Implant irritation

  • Patellar tendon injury risk

  • Screw loosening or failure

  • Limited availability in many countries

2.3 Vertical Wiring and Suture-Based Fixation

Yang et al. reported the use of separate vertical wiring fixation in 25 patients with inferior pole patella fractures.

At a mean follow-up of 22 months:

  • Mean Bostman score: 29.5 points

However, this technique may have limitations in:

  • Osteoporotic bone

  • Highly comminuted inferior pole fractures

because the small fracture fragments cannot provide sufficient fixation strength.

3. The Evolution of Tension Band Fixation for Patella Fractures

3.1 Traditional Tension Band Wiring Technique

In 1979, Müller et al. introduced the classic tension band wiring technique for patellar fracture fixation.

The traditional construct consists of:

  • Two parallel Kirschner wires (K-wires)

  • A figure-of-eight stainless steel wire loop

The biomechanical principle is based on converting tensile forces generated by the quadriceps mechanism into compressive forces at the anterior fracture surface during knee flexion.

This technique has become one of the most commonly used fixation methods for patellar fractures because of:

  • Simple surgical procedure

  • Reliable fixation strength

  • Low implant cost

  • Wide clinical availability

Biomechanical studies demonstrated that traditional tension band fixation can withstand loads up to approximately 395 N, exceeding the estimated quadriceps force during knee extension.

However, inferior pole patella fractures represent a special challenge because their fracture characteristics differ significantly from transverse patella fractures.

3.2 Limitations of Traditional Tension Band Wiring in Inferior Pole Fractures

Although tension band wiring provides excellent results in simple transverse patellar fractures, its application in inferior pole fractures remains controversial.

The main reasons include:

1. Small and Comminuted Distal Fragments

Most inferior pole fractures are comminuted.

The small distal fragments often cannot provide:

  • Adequate screw purchase

  • Stable K-wire fixation

  • Reliable resistance against quadriceps tension

This increases the risk of:

  • Fixation loosening

  • Fragment displacement

  • Loss of reduction

2. Difficulty Converting Tensile Forces Into Compression

The principle of tension band fixation depends on transforming anterior tensile forces into posterior compressive forces.

However, in inferior pole fractures:

  • The patellar tendon pulls the distal fragment inferiorly.

  • The small fracture fragments move anteriorly.

  • The fixation construct may fail to neutralize extensor mechanism forces.

Previous studies reported that isolated vertical wiring techniques may not effectively convert quadriceps tension into compression at the fracture site.

Traditional metal wire fixation may lead to:

  • Wire breakage

  • Implant irritation

  • Anterior knee pain

  • Secondary implant removal surgery

Therefore, an ideal fixation technique should provide:

  • Strong fixation

  • Preservation of patellar length

  • Protection of the extensor mechanism

  • Early postoperative rehabilitation

4. Modified Tension Band Technique for Inferior Pole Patella Fractures

To overcome these limitations, a modified tension band fixation technique was developed.

The technique combines:

  • Krackow suture reinforcement

  • Nice knot fixation

  • Traditional tension band wiring

The concept is to create a soft tissue–bone fixation system that distributes the extensor mechanism forces more effectively.

The main biomechanical objectives are:

  1. Reduce stress concentration on small inferior pole fragments.

  2. Improve fixation of comminuted fracture fragments.

  3. Convert quadriceps tensile forces into compressive forces.

  4. Maintain patellar height.

  5. Allow early knee mobilization.

5. Surgical Technique: Krackow Suture Combined With Nice Knot and Tension Band Wiring

Step 1. Patient Positioning and Preparation

Patients are positioned:

  • Supine position

  • General anesthesia

  • Pneumatic tourniquet applied to the proximal thigh

A prophylactic intravenous antibiotic, such as cefuroxime, is administered approximately 30 minutes before tourniquet inflation.

Step 2. Surgical Exposure

A midline anterior knee incision is performed:

  • Starting from the superior pole of the patella

  • Extending toward the tibial tubercle

After separating the medial and lateral soft tissues:

  • The patellar tendon is exposed.

  • The fracture site is identified.

  • Hematoma and debris are removed.

  • The patellar tendon attachment to the inferior pole fragment is carefully preserved.

Preserving the patellar tendon–bone attachment is essential for maintaining extensor mechanism continuity.

Step 3. Krackow Suture Reinforcement

The first nonabsorbable braided suture is placed using the Krackow locking stitch technique.

The suture pathway includes:

  • Both sides of the patellar tendon

  • The bone surface of the inferior pole fragment

  • The posterior aspect of the bone–tendon junction

The purpose of this step is to reinforce the weak inferior pole fragment and distribute tensile forces through the patellar tendon.

Step 4. Nice Knot Fixation

A second nonabsorbable braided suture is passed directly behind the bone–tendon junction.

After fracture reduction:

  • The second suture is tightened using a Nice knot.

  • The knot maintains reduction of the inferior pole fragment.

  • The first Krackow suture is then tightened through the proximal patella using surgical knots and multiple square knots.

The Nice knot provides:

  • Adjustable tension

  • Strong fixation

  • Improved load distribution

Step 5. Creation of Patellar Bone Tunnels

The proximal patella is temporarily elevated.

Using a 2.5 mm K-wire:

  • Two parallel bone tunnels are created.

  • The tunnels start from the anterior aspect of the articular surface.

  • They exit toward the superior anterior patella.

The distance between the tunnels should not be smaller than the width of the inferior pole fragment.

The Krackow and Nice knot sutures are then passed through these tunnels.

Step 6. Tension Band Wiring

After anatomical reduction:

Two parallel 2.0 mm K-wire holes are created approximately:

  • 5 mm anterior to the patellar articular surface

  • From the inferior pole toward the superior patella

A 1.2 mm stainless steel wire is passed through the holes to create a figure-of-eight tension band construct.

Important technical point:

The K-wires should not be inserted directly through the inferior pole fragment. Instead, they should enter from below the inferior pole and secure the proximal fracture fragment.

This positioning helps:

  • Maintain fixation strength

  • Avoid fragment splitting

  • Improve compression across the fracture site

Step 7. Stability Assessment

Before wound closure:

  • The knee is passively flexed approximately 45°–60°.

  • Fluoroscopy is used to confirm reduction.

  • The surgeon evaluates whether fixation remains stable during motion.

If no displacement occurs, layered closure is performed:

  1. Joint capsule

  2. Subcutaneous tissue

  3. Skin

Surgical Technique: Modified Tension Band Fixation for Inferior Pole Patella Fractures

Krachow suture.webp

Fig. 1 Panel (a) shows the passage of Line B through a simple fracture, and panel (b) shows the passage of Line B through a comminuted fracture. Line A was inserted from both sides of the patellar tendon using the Krachow suture technique, reaching the bone–tendon junction of the patella. Line B was also passed through this area at the posterior aspect of the inferior pole of the patella (A). For comminuted fractures of the inferior pole of the patella, Lines A and B were interwoven on the surface of the bone–tendon junction through continuous suturing to form a mesh-like structure (B). Two bone tunnels were created at the proximal end of the patella, through which Lines A and B were passed to the surface of the proximal patella (C). After reduction of the inferior patellar pole, Line B was tightened using a Nice knot to maintain the position of the fracture fragment (D). Line A was secured with a surgeon's knot followed by three square knots (E). Finally, K-wires were implanted with the knee in a flexed position to complete the tension-band fixation technique (F).

Surgical Positioning and Preparation

All patients underwent surgery under general anesthesia and were positioned supine on the operating table.

A pneumatic tourniquet was applied to the proximal thigh to minimize intraoperative bleeding. Prophylactic intravenous antibiotics (cefuroxime 1.5 g) were administered within 30 minutes before tourniquet inflation to reduce the risk of postoperative infection.

The knee was positioned in slight flexion to facilitate exposure of the patella and optimize visualization of the fracture site.

Surgical Approach and Fracture Exposure

A standard anterior midline incision was performed from the superior pole of the patella to the tibial tubercle.

After carefully dissecting the subcutaneous tissue, the patellar tendon and fracture fragments were exposed.

The fracture hematoma and interposed soft tissue were thoroughly irrigated and removed to achieve a clear fracture interface.

During exposure, special attention was paid to preserving the attachment of the patellar tendon to the inferior pole fragment.

This step is critical because the patellar tendon attachment provides an important biological and mechanical connection for reconstruction of the extensor mechanism.

Step-by-Step Procedure of Modified Tension Band Fixation

Step 1: Krackow Suture Reinforcement of the Patellar Tendon

The first nonabsorbable braided suture was placed using the Krackow locking stitch technique.

The suture was passed along both sides of the patellar tendon and advanced toward the inferior pole of the patella.

The suture then passed through the posterior aspect of the bone–tendon junction and exited behind the inferior fracture fragment.

This Krackow suture functions as a reinforcement structure to resist the tensile forces generated by the quadriceps mechanism during knee extension.

Step 2: Placement of Additional Reinforcing Suture

A second nonabsorbable braided suture was introduced directly through the posterior aspect of the bone–tendon junction.

This additional suture was designed to improve control of the inferior fracture fragment and provide enhanced stability during reduction.

The combination of Krackow suturing and reinforcing sutures creates a soft-tissue support system around the comminuted inferior pole fragment.

Step 3: Creation of Proximal Patellar Bone Tunnels

The proximal patellar fragment was temporarily elevated to allow creation of bone tunnels.

Two parallel bone tunnels were drilled through the proximal patella using a 2.5 mm Kirschner wire.

The tunnels were created from the anterior aspect of the articular surface toward the superior pole of the patella.

The distance between the two tunnels was maintained to ensure sufficient bone bridge strength.

These tunnels served as pathways for passing the reinforcement sutures and allowed conversion of tensile forces into compressive forces across the fracture site.

Step 4: Reduction of the Inferior Pole Fragment and Nice Knot Fixation

After anatomical reduction of the inferior pole fragment, the second reinforcing suture was first tightened using the Nice knot technique.

The Nice knot provides a strong sliding-lock mechanism that allows controlled compression and maintains reduction stability.

After the inferior pole fragment was stabilized, the first Krackow suture was passed through the proximal patellar tunnels.

The suture was secured using a surgical knot followed by three square knots.

This sequential tightening strategy allows progressive compression of the fracture site while minimizing displacement of small comminuted fragments.

Step 5: Application of Traditional Tension Band Wiring

After provisional fixation, fluoroscopy was used to confirm fracture reduction.

The knee was positioned at approximately 45°–60° flexion.

Two parallel 2.0 mm bone tunnels were created approximately 5 mm anterior to the articular surface, extending from the inferior pole toward the superior patella.

A 1.2 mm stainless steel wire was passed through these tunnels and configured into a figure-of-eight tension band construct.

Unlike conventional techniques, the Kirschner wires were not inserted directly through the inferior fracture fragment.

Instead, they were introduced from the distal aspect and directed into the proximal fracture fragment.

This modification avoids additional fragmentation of the inferior pole and improves fixation reliability.

Intraoperative Stability Assessment

Following fixation, passive knee flexion and extension were performed under direct visualization.

The surgeon evaluated:

  • fracture stability;

  • maintenance of reduction;

  • integrity of the fixation construct;

  • absence of displacement during knee motion.

The joint capsule, subcutaneous tissue, and skin were then closed layer by layer using absorbable sutures.

Technical Principles of the Modified Fixation Method

The modified tension band technique combines three mechanical concepts:

1. Soft Tissue Reinforcement

The Krackow suture reconstructs the patellar tendon–inferior pole connection and reduces stress concentration at the bone–tendon interface.

2. Controlled Fragment Compression

The Nice knot provides strong and adjustable compression, especially useful for comminuted inferior pole fragments.

3. Conversion of Tensile Force Into Compression Force

The tension band construct transforms anterior tensile forces generated during quadriceps contraction into compressive forces across the fracture site.

This principle follows the classic biomechanical concept of tension band fixation described by Müller et al.

Why This Technique Improves Fixation Stability

Compared with conventional tension band wiring alone, this modified technique provides several advantages:

  • Improved control of small inferior pole fragments;

  • Reduced risk of postoperative fragment displacement;

  • Preservation of patellar height;

  • Enhanced fixation strength in comminuted fractures;

  • Allows early knee range-of-motion exercises;

  • Avoids partial patellectomy and its associated biomechanical problems.

By combining soft tissue reconstruction with tension band principles, this method provides a reliable option for challenging inferior pole patella fractures, particularly those with comminution and extensor mechanism disruption.

Clinical Outcomes and Discussion of Modified Tension Band Fixation for Inferior Pole Patella Fractures

Clinical Outcomes After Modified Tension Band Fixation

A total of 15 patients with inferior pole patella fractures were treated using the modified tension band fixation technique combining:

  • Krackow suture reinforcement;

  • Nice knot fixation;

  • Figure-of-eight tension band wiring.

All patients completed at least 12 months of postoperative follow-up.

The average follow-up period was:

13.73 ± 1.71 months

Radiographic bone union was defined as the disappearance of the fracture line and restoration of continuous trabecular bone across the fracture site.

The average time to fracture healing was:

9 weeks (range: 8–13 weeks)

The average hospital stay was:

9 ± 1.7 days

No patients developed:

  • anterior knee pain;

  • inferior pole re-fracture;

  • tension band wire breakage;

  • fixation failure.

Functional Recovery After Surgery

Knee Range of Motion Results

At the final follow-up, all patients achieved satisfactory knee function without significant limitation.

The average knee range of motion was:

128.46° ± 7.07°

(range: 113.4°–137.8°)

This indicates that the modified fixation method can provide sufficient stability to allow early functional rehabilitation after surgery.

Bostman Score Evaluation

Bostman Score (1).webp

Functional outcomes were assessed using the Bostman scoring system.

The Bostman score evaluates:

  • knee range of motion;

  • pain;

  • working ability;

  • quadriceps muscle atrophy;

  • walking assistance;

  • joint effusion;

  • giving-way symptoms;

  • stair climbing ability.

The scoring system includes:

  • Excellent: 28–30 points;

  • Good: 20–27 points;

  • Poor: <20 points.

At the final follow-up:

The average Bostman score was:

28.40 ± 1.29 points

(range: 26–30 points)

Clinical results:

  • 11 patients achieved excellent outcomes;

  • 4 patients achieved good outcomes.

No patient experienced poor functional recovery.

Discussion: Why Is Inferior Pole Patella Fracture Difficult to Treat?

Inferior pole patella fractures represent a special type of extra-articular avulsion fracture.

Unlike transverse patella fractures, these fractures:

  • usually involve the distal non-articular portion of the patella;

  • frequently present with comminution;

  • often disrupt the patellar tendon attachment;

  • may cause loss of patellar height.

Because the inferior pole plays an important role in maintaining the extensor mechanism, improper treatment may result in:

  • patella baja;

  • reduced quadriceps efficiency;

  • anterior knee pain;

  • limited knee flexion;

  • patellofemoral degeneration.

Therefore, the primary goal of surgical treatment is:

  1. Preserve patellar length;

  2. Restore extensor mechanism continuity;

  3. Achieve stable fixation;

  4. Allow early knee rehabilitation.

Comparison With Existing Treatment Methods

Partial Patellectomy: Why It Is No Longer Preferred

Partial patellectomy was historically used for severely comminuted inferior pole fractures.

However, removing the inferior pole decreases patellar height and alters normal patellofemoral biomechanics.

This may increase vertical loading forces across the patellofemoral joint and accelerate degenerative changes.

Therefore, current literature generally discourages partial patellectomy whenever reconstruction is achievable.

The modern treatment trend has shifted toward:

preservation of the inferior pole and restoration of the extensor mechanism.

Basket Plates, Mesh Plates and Specialized Implants

Various implants have been developed for inferior pole patella fractures, including:

  • basket plates;

  • mesh plates;

  • angle-stable locking plates;

  • specially designed inferior pole plates.

These implants can provide stronger fixation and allow early mobilization.

However, several limitations remain:

Potential disadvantages:

  • irritation of the patellar tendon;

  • anterior knee discomfort;

  • screw-related complications;

  • implant prominence;

  • limited availability in some regions.

For these reasons, simple and reproducible fixation techniques remain clinically valuable.

Limitations of Traditional Vertical Wiring Techniques

Vertical wiring techniques have shown acceptable clinical outcomes.

However, biomechanical limitations exist.

Traditional vertical wire fixation may fail because:

  • tensile forces from quadriceps contraction are not effectively converted into compression;

  • inferior fragments may migrate anteriorly;

  • small comminuted fragments may lack sufficient purchase.

Previous studies reported that fragment displacement and wire failure could occur, particularly in highly comminuted fractures.

Advantages of the Modified Tension Band Technique

The modified tension band fixation technique was designed to overcome these limitations by combining:

1. Krackow Suture Reinforcement

The Krackow stitch provides strong fixation along the patellar tendon and distributes tensile forces across the bone–tendon interface.

This reduces stress concentration on small inferior pole fragments.

2. Nice Knot Compression System

The Nice knot allows:

  • controlled tightening;

  • stable compression;

  • improved fixation of small fragments.

Because the sutures surround the comminuted fragments like a soft tissue cage, small bone fragments do not need to be removed.

This helps preserve the biological environment for fracture healing.

3. Improved Biomechanical Conversion

The combination of:

  • Krackow sutures;

  • Nice knot fixation;

  • figure-of-eight tension band wiring;

allows anterior tensile forces generated during knee extension to be converted into compressive forces at the fracture site.

This follows the fundamental principle of tension band fixation.

Early Rehabilitation After Modified Fixation

One important advantage of this technique is that the stable fixation construct allows early postoperative knee movement.

Early rehabilitation provides several benefits:

  • prevents knee stiffness;

  • improves quadriceps recovery;

  • reduces postoperative adhesion;

  • accelerates return to daily activities.

In this study, patients achieved excellent functional outcomes without requiring prolonged immobilization.

Study Limitations

Although the modified tension band fixation technique showed promising clinical outcomes, several limitations should be acknowledged.

Small Sample Size

This study included only 15 patients.

A larger patient population is required to confirm the reliability of this technique.

Lack of Comparative Control Group

The study did not directly compare this method with:

  • basket plate fixation;

  • mesh plate fixation;

  • traditional tension band wiring;

  • suture anchor techniques.

Future comparative studies are needed.

Limited Biomechanical Evidence

Although clinical outcomes were favorable, additional biomechanical testing is required to evaluate:

  • maximum failure load;

  • displacement under cyclic loading;

  • fixation strength compared with other techniques.

Future Perspectives in Inferior Pole Patella Fracture Fixation

The treatment trend of inferior pole patella fractures is moving toward:

  • preservation rather than excision;

  • biological fixation rather than extensive hardware;

  • early rehabilitation rather than prolonged immobilization.

Future developments may include:

  • stronger suture-based fixation systems;

  • customized low-profile implants;

  • biomechanical optimization of tension band constructs.

The combination of soft tissue reconstruction and modern fixation principles may provide safer and more reliable solutions for complex inferior pole patella fractures.

Conclusion: A Simple and Effective Option for Inferior Pole Patella Fracture Treatment

The modified tension band fixation technique combining Krackow suture reinforcement, Nice knot fixation, and tension band wiring provides stable fixation and satisfactory functional recovery for inferior pole patella fractures.

The technique offers several advantages:

  • preserves patellar height;

  • maintains extensor mechanism function;

  • improves fixation stability;

  • supports early knee rehabilitation;

  • avoids complications associated with partial patellectomy and bulky implants.

Although further biomechanical and comparative clinical studies are required, this method represents a promising and practical option for the surgical treatment of inferior pole patella fractures.

Contact us
One Stop Solution Provider

Contact Toolmed and Make a Difference Together!

Quick Quote
Orthopedic Implants & Instruments Manufacturer and Exporter from China

Products

Links

Contact Us

   0086-13813553925
   No.23 Wangcai Road, Konggang Industrial Park, Luoxi Town, Xinbei District, 2131000, Changzhou City, Jiangsu Province, P.R. of China
© COPYRIGHT 2025 CHANGZHOU TOOLMED MEDICAL INSTRUMENT CO., LTD. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.